Archive for the ‘Copyright’ Tag
Koinup, the European-based home of virtual artwork, has announced that you may now set your copyright permissions on your works for Creative Commons allowances. The new capability, which you can set either on upload or on each individual item, includes full copyright and all five standard CC settings (Attribution, Attribution NoDerivs, Attribution NonCommercial, Attribution NonCommercial NoDerivs, Attribution NonCommercial ShareALike).
Creative Commons, in case you’ve been under a rock somewhere, essentially lets you determine what kinds of allowances you will grant on usage of your work. If you want a full-on copyright, with all rights needing to be cleared through you, you make it the standard All Rights Reserved, and the usual © symbol will be placed somewhere in a legal disclaimer on your page(s). But if you’re willing to share the work to some degree, you can specify, once you’re familiar with what each of the Creative Commons allowances entails, by making the appropriate settings on your upload. A different symbol can then be placed on the page, usually something like this:
(as you’ll find in my sidebar very high up the run); or
(you’ll find this on Flickr). Clicking on the graphic will take you to a page at Creative Commons.org explaining the rights in detail. This provides a highly versatile method of allowing others to use your work while still keeping control of it in the end.
To help promote the new capability, Koinup’s owner, pier, has opened a new group called Pile-Up, which is aimed specifically at artists sharing their work with others for the purpose of modification and derivation, then republishing it in the same group in the new form. If you have a Koinup account, consider joining the group and trying your hand. If you don’t have a Koinup account, perhaps it’s time…. (grin)
While cruising Plurk tonight before finishing up another article, I ran across a long conversation thread begun by Strawberry Singh, one of the excellent models to be found in Second Life, and well known as a public face for the couture house of Zaara Kohine for some time. It took me by surprise, and was rather dismaying — an account holder on Koinup, the European photo site for exclusive virtual-world work, has been scarfing photos from others, posting them to their account, and claiming them for his/her own.
There was no reason to doubt the word of reputable Residents, but a good journalist checks, and I try to be a good journalist. Following the link took me to an account named “15love,” and right on the front page were two photos skimmed off blogs, one by Berry and the other by Dailyn Holfe. (Note: in monitoring the account, Dailyn’s picture, which was cropped to remove her name, has disappeared; Berry’s is still up.) Other pictures were attributed to The Sims and IMVU, but the graphic style was clearly not from those worlds. Some pictures appeared to have been simply slapped into the account without even taking the effort to rename them from the “hash”-style file name automatically assigned to the original by the Koinup system. I clipped out screenshots, which I serve up below. (My apologies for the peculiar formatting of the page when you see it; click through on the link.)
Read the rest of this entry »
In the several pieces of news to come down the Grid since my computer went into the shop, the most interesting — not the most important, probably, but the most interesting to me — is Hamlet Au’s report on how a major player in intellectual property has stepped in with objections. Trident Media Group, the agents of the estate of Dune‘s Frank Herbert, have sent a cease-and-desist order to Linden Lab, which passed it on to the Dune role-playing group. They have complied with the order by removing as many references to the Dune franchise as they can find within their power. However, they plan to continue the game as a more generic environment. (See Ham’s article for the details.)
This article kicked off quite a discussion, with 25 comments as of this writing. At least one of the best-known pundits in SL, Crap Mariner, has weighed in; and the flap has even attracted the attention of the master of the open source movement, Richard Stallman, with an interesting take on the legality of “intellectual property.”
I won’t take a position arguing against or for such eminences, at least not knowingly. What I will say is my own opinion: that the Herbert estate has the right to defend their legal copyrights, which means anything connected with the Dune series and its sequels by Brian Herbert — but that it’s darn silly to be picking on such a small community that simply wishes to celebrate the fantasy and live the dream. No money is being made here, except perhaps by Linden Lab in terms of tier for the regions. Speculation: this is probably the basis on which the cease-and-desist was issued — in which case, Vooper Werribee and his comrades are “collateral damage” in the battle, innocent bystanders who are being given the finger unwittingly by Trident Media. This could bring the franchise more ill-will than good, especially if Crap’s own speculation that Trident plans to start a Dune sim of their own are correct.
At least, in all the fooferaw, Vooper doesn’t seem to have lost his sense of humor. From Ham’s article:
…I asked him if he planned to remove his remaining Dune-esque objects from Second Life.
“No,” he answers. “We’ve made all the compliance changes we intend to now. Basically we’ve removed the words ‘Dune’, Bene Gesserit, Atreides, etc. from as many object names and descriptions as we can find. But we still intend to keep the place as a ‘generic’ sci-fi desert planet with spice mining. And still intend to roleplay here.” Ironically, he tells me Star Trek roleplayers have expressed an interest in using it for “first contact” scenarios. “Some Star Wars players are interested in using the place as a ‘spice mining’ base,” he adds. “As Star Wars has ‘spice’.”
“The spice must flow?” I suggest.
Vooper Werribee laughs. “It sure must!”
(With thanks to Dusan Writer, who put me on to this while I was tag-surfing the WordPress.com blogs)
Rather late, but at last, Linden Lab has published an article (by LauraP Linden) on the Big Blog, addressing most of the questions SLoggers and others have raised about their now legendary (read: notorious) branding policy changes. Anyone who writes a SLog, or is thinking of creating one, make sure to read this!
The pity is that it took so great effort on the part of the SLogosphere, and the raising of much bad blood toward LL, to get clarification of matters that should have been addressed back in March, when the policy was first revised from the old liberal-use mode. Linden Lab has had to endure in that time the castigation of a number of influential bloggers — I don’t necessarily rank myself in this category (grin) — the belief by large amounts of the remainder of the Residents that they were wasting time on stupidity when they should focus on Fixing the Grid, and a three-day protest action by said prominent bloggers to draw attention to the question. Even now, some worry that this is no improvement (I see it as much clearer, myself), or that key questions still need addressing. The published E-mail address for trademark and brand questions, email@example.com, is going to be very busy for some time to come. I hope they give better answers individually than we were receiving at large and at first.
Ah, well; for my part, I think the main problem is solved. After placing a finis opus on this article, I intend to enjoy a few well-earned fingers of Bushmills and water, and then collapse in preparation for cleaning my house in the bright of morning — and my store inventory in RL on Sunday night!
In my last article, I linked to Rheta Shawn’s ongoing article listing known participants in the bloggers’ protest strike to encourage Linden Lab to clarify its new trademark/brand policy. The comments to her post show that the bloggers are approaching their concern with a sense of humor as well as seriousness — and not a little grasp of the classics, as well. A painting by Delacroix, invocation of Victor Hugo and the musical Les Misérables that derives from Hugo’s masterpiece; it’s all there.
One writer, Laetizia Coronet of Virtual Village Voice, took it to the next level. Revolutionaries have used the red flag as a symbol of revolt for years, and that includes, of course, revolutionaries of a more recent vintage. In her comment, Laetizia did a bit of light filk — to the Internationale! In the same vein, I responded that if we were going to be subjected to Marxian polemics next, I’d be putting in a phone call — to the ghost of J. Edgar Hoover. (The modern FBI doesn’t worry too much about Commie plots….)
All that reminds me of my college days. I have a Bachelor of Arts in humanities (hail the Seven Liberal Arts!), and was, of course, required to take several core classes. In the one dealing with the 1800s, we were required to either write one major paper on a topic of our choice, or several smaller papers from a list of suggestions. One classmate chose the mini-papers, and one of the suggestions was Karl Marx. She purchased copies of Das Kapital and The Communist Manifesto, and was reading them at work during lunch time. They were laying on her desk, out in plain view, as the boss walked by. According to my classmate, he took one look and winced, and begged her (jokingly, I’m sure) to put those things away in a drawer! I think he was afraid she was planning to set off the revolution there in his company….
At this press time, 23 Second Life bloggers have gone on a three-day virtual strike in protest of Linden Lab’s introduction of their new Brand Center trademark rules.
As reported here and elsewhere, LL has changed their rules from an open, easy to read and understand set of guidelines that encouraged bloggers to write about the virtual world, to a set of rather opaque rules that have left many writers uncertain what the status of their blogs will be at the end of the 90-day grace period. Many writers are wondering if they must pepper their articles with ™, ® and © symbols every time they mention the words “Second Life” or “Linden Lab” in an article; others fear being forced to change domain names that contain “Second Life” or “sl.” There have been some legal concerns that, having been compelled to agree to revised Terms of Service that include the new branding rules, any failure to comply completely will result in a shutdown of an account.
Gwyneth Llewelyn, one of the best-known SL bloggers, has demanded a clarification of LL’s new policy beyond the second article posted in their Big Blog (the official SL blog), which is considered essentially a rehash of the actual Brand Center page without any true explanation of what the Lab’s intent toward bloggers is. At the end of her article, she stated that she would “go on strike” for three days if no full explanation was given by LL. Other bloggers have now chosen to join her in this. A list to date of participating blogs can be found at Rheta Shan’s blog, Rheta’s World, along with a nice touch of humor that raises the image of a Les Misérables-like stand on the virtual barricades, raising the red flag of revolution. A protest stand in front of the Governor’s Mansion in Clementina is planned for Sunday, at good times for both European and American participants. Interested participants should contact Gwyneth Llewelyn for more details.
Linden Lab is still botching its public relations with a group that has done it more good for free than any amount of paid publicity could have done. The appointment of a new communications manager, Katt Linden, is a positive step for the future; but they should address the present as well, which includes this situation. That they have not, in a form that is clear and satisfactory to the Residents concerned, does not augur well for their future communication ability. While it is quite possible that Second Life could have grown in similar ways from paid advertising, nothing beats the advertising of satisfied customers — the legendary word of mouth. Someone who likes what they see will try to get more people involved in it to share the fun; they will talk it up to friends and strangers alike.
Similarly, though, a dissatisfied customer can also express their dissatisfaction — and many studies have shown that the words of a dissatisfied customer affect more people in the long run. Those studies were done years ago, in the days before public use of the Internet. Imagine now how much reach this powerful communications tool can have. The current customer base outside of the concerned bloggers are mostly unworried at this time; but potential future customers can run across all the negative press generated by the controversy, and be turned away by concerns over a potentially tyrannical situation.
In their second blog writeup, Catherine Linden also seems to believe that we don’t understand why trademarks are important to companies. She fails to realize, apparently, that there are many professionals, corporate types, Highly Educated Persons, and just general smart people that understand quite well what value a trademark holds. Few or none of us have any objection to LL’s protecting their rights — provided that they do not step on our rights in the process. The newly restrictive attempt at trademark enforcement, coupled with a failure or disregard to explain things adequately to satisfy our concerns, makes LL look even worse in the eyes of an increasingly estranged customer base.
The ball is in Linden Lab’s court. How will they respond now?